Game reference

Alliance coordination: targets, roles, and handoffs

A practical way to organize a fort session without splitting attacks or leaving a newly captured objective undefended.

Agree on availability before choosing a target

An alliance roster does not tell you how many members can act now. Before announcing a push, ask who can attack, who can defend, and when they must leave. Include a time zone. “After dinner” is ambiguous; “18:00 UTC for 20 minutes” lets members decide whether they can participate.

A smaller group with a known finish time should choose an objective it can support for that window. A plan requiring everyone to stay indefinitely tends to fail at the handoff, even if the initial capture succeeds.

Send a message that answers the next question

Use this as an example to adapt, not a claim about a scheduled game event:

Fort plan: Silver, 18:00 UTC. Reply if you can attack or defend until 18:20. Check current ownership before starting. Attackers focus Silver; defenders wait for the capture call. If Bronze ownership changes, we reassess before the next push.

The message names the target, start, duration, roles, and a condition that can change the plan. Those details are more useful than asking everyone to attack “the strongest fort.” Read the fort bonus table before deciding whether attack, defence, or boost generation is the priority.

Split responsibility without splitting damage

One person can track ownership and announce changes while others concentrate on their assigned action. Attackers should know which fort to hit; defenders should know whether to prepare for a capture or reinforce an owned fort. Distributing attacks across three shielded targets can make all three feel stalled.

The useful checkpoint is effective progress after shields, not just the number of attacks sent. If the target retains a large shield while your group’s resources run down, pause and review the remaining commitment. A daily task asking for distinct forts is a personal objective; it should not silently override the shared capture plan.

Make the handoff explicit

After a capture, name the players who can still defend and the time when the next group will take over. If no one can remain, say so. Other members can then choose between holding the objective and pursuing another target with accurate expectations.

Before leaving, post the current owner, whether the fort is under pressure, and any change in Silver or Bronze ownership. Do not assume yesterday’s bonuses or the original target announcement still describe the map.

Review contribution rather than blame

After the war, compare the intended objective with the completed-day contribution and rewards. Attack damage and shield contribution both count, so a player who defended should not be judged by attack damage alone. Ask where the plan became unclear: start time, target, role, or handoff.

Choose one improvement for the next session. If attendance was the problem, shorten the planned window. If capture succeeded but ownership was immediately lost, arrange defence earlier. If nobody understood the bonus change, give one member responsibility for calling it out.

For a suspected missing reward, send support the completed war date and contribution screen. Never share account passwords or sign-in codes in alliance chat.

Choose your next guide

Find help by problem in the Player Guide, or browse all game references.